That’s of course where the new Studio Display comes into the picture and the Mac Studio also works with Apple’s Pro Display XDR, along with many other more affordable displays. Like Mac mini and Mac Pro, Mac Studio requires you to bring your own display(s). One more connectivity aspect to consider, how important is having an always-on, dedicated desktop Mac to you vs a Mac notebook? Display(s) However, on the flip side, if you’re debating something like a Mac mini or MacBook Pro against the Mac Studio, a $200-$300 Thunderbolt dock could save you a lot of cash in the big picture (as long as you don’t need a higher-end M1 chip). Outside of the Mac Pro, Mac Studio features connectivity that all other Macs have to rely on an external Thunderbolt dock for – like 6 Thunderbolt 4/USB4 ports, 10Gb Ethernet, and a UHS-II SDXC slot.Īnd of course, the front-facing ports offer thoughtful convenience on Mac Studio, something you don’t get with the Mac mini or iMac. Mac Studio vs the rest of the Mac lineup delivers an impressive array of I/O that was crafted around feedback from actual creative pros and other Mac power users.
Mac Studio reviews: Impressive power and efficiency, but overkill for many users.But it may be important to consider whether the M1 Ultra (or Max) might be overkill for your needs. Reviews corroborate Apple’s claims of top performance and efficiency all while remaining near-silent. Thanks to a powerhouse media engine, the M1 Ultra can handle up to 18 streams of 8K ProRes.Īnd Apple says the M1 Ultra can transcode video up to 5.6x faster than a 28-core Mac Pro with the Afterburner hardware accelerator.Īpple also says the M1 Ultra will offer huge performance gains for graphic designers working with large 3D environments, and developers compiling code. One group of users that will see a notable ROI with Mac Studio will be creatives working with video.
IMAC PRO VS IMAC 2017 PC
And like the rest of the super-efficient Apple Silicon, the company touts the M1 Ultra packs industry-leading performance per watt.Ĭompared to a 16-core PC desktop, M1 Ultra offers more performance with 100W less power.Īnd Apple says M1 Ultra uses 200W less power compared to the top-end discrete GPU (but the Ultra can’t outdo the RTX 3090, here’s why Apple’s chart below is misleading). So there will still be use cases where the Intel Mac Pro reigns as Apple’s most powerful Mac.Įven so, the M1 Ultra delivers incredible power in a very compact design. However, it’s important to keep in mind Mac Studio can’t match the 1.5TB max RAM or dual Radeon Pro W6800X Duo with 128GB dedicated GPU memory of the Mac Pro. We’ve seen the first M1 Ultra benchmark results and it did beat the top-end 28-core Intel Mac Pro for the multi-core score. In an interview, we learned Apple is using the term modular to refer to Mac Studio as a bring your own display desktop – not actually modular component-wise like the Intel Mac Pro. While Apple has used the term “modular” to describe Mac Studio, all of the hardware components are fixed, so you’ll need to configure it how you want it from the get-go. Here’s how the M1, M1 Pro, M1 Max, and M1 Ultra compare in the Mac lineup: Leaping up from the M1 Max, M1 Ultra brings total unified memory up to a max of 128GB alongside a 20-core CPU, up to 64-core GPU, 800GB/s memory bandwidth, and super-fast 7.4GB/s for the SSD storage. UltraFusion is also what enables Apple’s multi-chip interconnect to offer 4x better bandwidth than other companies’ similar tech. That’s because the Ultra is made by combining two Max chips with “UltraFusion.” Apple says thanks to its custom-built packaging architecture, macOS sees the M1 Ultra as a single SoC. The new M1 Ultra chip (only available in Mac Studio) doubles most of the specs of the M1 Max. Mac Studio vs Mac mini, iMac MacBook Pro, Mac Pro Performance Mac Studio vs Mac mini, iMac MacBook Pro, Mac Pro.
0 kommentar(er)
